For flow-critical processes
The strongest effect appears where delayed pallet transport immediately affects warehouse or production continuity.
Flagship solution
This is the solution for organizations that treat automation as an operating architecture with safety, integrations and a growth plan, not only a single vehicle.
A combination of hardware, traffic logic, safety and system integration inside one operating model.
The project is led by the expected impact on flow, not by the technology effect alone.
Transport tasks can be triggered by real process needs and system events.
Routes, exceptions and work conditions are designed around the building and the process.
Autonomous forklifts make the most sense where predictable material flow stabilizes the rhythm of the warehouse or plant and creates the base for wider automation.
The strongest effect appears where delayed pallet transport immediately affects warehouse or production continuity.
Autonomous forklifts make the most sense when the first stage is meant to become the base for a wider automation architecture.
The solution works best where task, location and priority statuses must be exchanged with WMS, MES or ERP.
We design deployments around specific goals: stable supply, fewer interruptions, better use of operators and process predictability.
The key model parameters are grouped in one place so the user can compare truck type, payload and fit without opening every product card separately.
| Parametr | HT-15 AGV Floor-level pallet transport and a fast first deployment scope. View product | ST-1430 storage AGV Repeatable pallet put-away and buffer handling. View product | CB-2030/2040 counterbalanced AGV Flexible pallet handling in mixed logistics processes. View product | LA-1430 reach truck AGV Precise pallet put-away in storage zones and rack interfaces. View product |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vehicle type | Pallet AGV | Stacker AGV | Counterbalanced AGV | Reach truck AGV |
| Rated payload | 1500 kg | 1400 kg | 2000 kg | 1400 kg |
| Lift height | 205 mm | 1600 / 3000 mm | 3000 mm | 3000 mm |
| Navigation | Laser SLAM | Laser SLAM | Laser SLAM | Laser SLAM |
| Pallet type | Open pallet | Open pallet | Open / closed pallet | Open / closed pallet |
| Best fit | floor transport and buffers | storage and buffer zones | mixed warehouse processes | precise rack put-away |
The right order of work matters as much as the vehicle itself. That is why we combine process analysis, safety and integration into one deployment path.
We identify the pallet flow with the biggest impact on performance and the clearest business case.
We define traffic architecture, load exchange points, exceptions and priority rules.
We connect vehicles with supervisory software and process data so transport is driven by real operating needs.
After stabilizing the first area, we extend the architecture only where the next step has clear business value.
The strongest financial effect comes from reducing interruptions, taking simple trips away from the team and making supply and pickup more predictable.
We first identify the transport relationship that has the highest impact on continuity and only then define the technology and scale of the project.
The vehicle works whenever the process requires repetitive transport without gaps between shifts and tasks.
The strongest return appears where transport directly affects the continuity of supply and outbound flow.
One critical process first, then expansion to more routes or process relations.
The team can focus on higher-value work instead of repeating the same pallet movement all shift long.
Critical process points gain a regular, predictable rhythm independent of temporary labour shortages.
Task, blockage and status data become structured and ready for further operating decisions.
The first stage helps decide whether the next step should add routes, vehicles or a deeper software layer.
The team can focus on higher-value work instead of repeating the same pallet movement all shift long.
Critical process points gain a regular, predictable rhythm independent of temporary labour shortages.
Task, blockage and status data become structured and ready for further operating decisions.
The first stage helps decide whether the next step should add routes, vehicles or a deeper software layer.
Sites with mixed traffic and dynamic material flow require an approach where ISO 3691-4, risk assessment and exception scenarios are part of the rollout core.
Autonomous forklifts work in environments where the relationship between people, machines and manual transport must be designed consciously.
The project covers not only the standard trip but also blockages, narrowing, stops, priorities and how the system reacts to deviations.
Safety requirements are treated as part of the rollout architecture, not as a document added after commissioning.
Stable deployment needs a consistent standard of carriers, handover points and operational readiness for a new working model.
The most important functions should improve process stability, mixed-traffic safety and readiness for further automation development.
Safe reaction to people, forklifts and unexpected objects in mixed traffic.
Recognition of pick-up and drop-off locations to improve repeatability and reduce handling errors.
Stable behaviour in environments where AGV share space with people and manual transport.
Connection with task logic, location states and process priorities in upstream systems.
Readiness to grow with more vehicles, routes and rollout stages without losing control.
The highest value comes from a rollout where process analysis, integration and post-launch support are planned as one responsible delivery model.
A launch model based on process analysis, layout, KPIs and a safe first deployment scope.
Connection with WMS, MES, ERP or local task logic so the system works inside the real process.
Manufacturer support and clear responsibility rules after go-live.
Further service, system development and stable operation after the warranty period.
A support model aligned with process criticality, response time and service scope.
In some organizations the best effect comes from stabilizing simpler pallet routes first and only then expanding towards a broader AGV architecture.
A strong starting point for companies that want to begin automation with simpler repetitive pallet routes.
A direction for warehouse scenarios that require more precise put-away and retrieval operations.
Most often when pallet transport is regular, critical for flow and executed through many similar trips on every shift.
No. In most cases a staged approach works best, where the first process shows value quickly and prepares the ground for further areas.
We review trip volume, shift pattern, current process cost, downtime impact and the opportunity to reassign operators to higher-value work.
We can review trip volume, critical process points, safety and the architecture of the first rollout stage.