ST-1430 storage AGV
AGV stacker for pallet storage, repetitive put-away, buffers and low- to mid-level storage tasks.
Product category
Storage and racking
The Storage and racking category is built for operations that need more discipline around storage processes, transfer points and repeatable pallet positioning.
AGV solutions for storage, buffers, counterbalanced traffic and automation of storage-related processes.
ST-1016-OMNI
Omnidirectional stacker AGV with 1,000 kg capacity for pallet storage tasks in narrow aisles and constrained warehouse spaces.
ST-1450 storage AGV
Storage AGV for higher lift ranges and more demanding warehouse automation tasks.
CB-2030/2040 counterbalanced AGV
Counterbalanced AGV forklift for direct pallet handling in mixed warehouse and manufacturing processes.
LA-1430 reach truck AGV
Reach truck AGV with extending mast for high-bay operations and precise pallet handling in storage zones.
How to compare models
What usually differentiates vehicles in this category
Inside one category, the real differences usually come from carrier handling, operating geometry, lift range, navigation behavior and the amount of process discipline needed on the route.
A strong shortlist should compare how each model supports the target flow, not only which specification looks strongest on paper. That keeps the first rollout aligned with the actual process and ROI goal.
It is also worth checking which model keeps the rollout architecture simpler, because lower integration effort, clearer station logic and easier traffic organization often speed up the first measurable result.
Review whether the transport unit is a pallet, dolly, custom cart or another carrier that changes the pick-up and drop-off method.
Compare turning space, aisle width, workstation access and height requirements before narrowing the shortlist.
Decide early whether the project needs simple route execution or deeper orchestration with traffic control and upstream system integration.
Category selection checklist
How to narrow the shortlist before the workshop
The category is a good fit only if it matches the carrier, the handover logic and the route environment you want to automate first. That should be verified before model-by-model comparison starts.
It is also worth confirming which operating constraint matters most now: lift height, route repeatability, transfer precision, mixed-traffic behavior or how quickly the fleet has to scale after the pilot.
Start from the actual flow and exception handling, not only from the target specification sheet.
Define what the first stage must prove operationally before deciding which model deserves testing.
Prefer the category that supports the next expansion step without forcing a redesign of the whole concept.
Next step
Do you want help selecting the right model inside this category?
We can compare route logic, lift range, carrier type and process constraints to narrow the shortlist before the technical workshop.